I see the reaction as going through a few stages. These studies regularly claim that children raised by their biological parents in stable homes have an advantage over children raised in single parent or unmarried couple households; in a limited view, these studies are correct but they are presenting a deceptive narrative.
In doing so, they take full advantage of their relationship to make not only their own lives better, but those of their neighbors as well. Who says who marriage is to be defined by? Once we've dealt with it then we can allow gay adoption.
But the attempt itself runs against the grain of everything the First Amendment stands for - one does not truly have freedom of religion if one does not have the right to freedom from religion as well.
We now have the backing of a panel of experts and the police telling us we are up to the job. But it is really subtly different. Children raised in same-sex households have no worse academic, psychological, or health results then children who grow up in demographically similar heterosexual households.
The problem with all that special rights talk is that it proceeds from that very assumption, that because of all the civil rights laws in this country that everyone is already equal, so therefore any rights gay people are being granted must therefore be special.
Gay marriage would undermine sodomy laws. In terms of federal law, as long as an individual is not inciting violence, trespassing, or presenting a hazard, they are able to say even the vilest anti-gay rhetoric. Unlike homosexual attraction, homosexual activity is a choice and is up to the individual.
What about the argument that when you make marriage about rights and equal treatment you ultimately open up the field to other sorts of relationships — like polygamous or incestuous relationships — as well? But does that mean the discomfort of some gays to heterosexual couples should be a reason to deny heterosexuals the right to marry?
Other players were the usual suspects, the Catholic church, several of the more conservative Protestant denominations, the American Family Association, Focus On The Family, their various political subsidiary groups, and a whole host of smaller right-wing political and religious organizations, including a few out-right hate groups.
The concept of not denying people their rights unless you can show a compelling reason to do so is the very basis of the American ideal of human rights. Eventually the fear and disinformation campaign took its toll, emotion overtook reason, the majority in favor of gay marriage slowly eroded, and the proposition passed rather narrowly.
They will say things like, look, both the Old and New Testaments in the Bible are very clear about this: Organizations that receive public money, however, and which must adhere to anti-discrimination laws, should rightly be challenged if they engage in discrimination against a protected class of people.
Psychologists tell us that what makes the difference is the love of the parents, not their gender. Preach or perpetrate violence against homosexuals.SOME POPULAR ARGUMENTS FOR HOMOSEXUALITY combinations of variables, including biological/genetic or hormonal irregularities, there are serious problems with the argument that homosexuals are somewhat sick or abnormal, then the Bible’s prescription is the same for homosexuals as it is for all other sinners: a call to.
Homosexual people are entitled to make their own moral mistakes, but they are not entitled to insist everyone else approve and they are certainly not entitled to insist that children be used as guinea pigs in a gay rights social engineering experiment.
Aug 09, · An Argument For Same-Sex Marriage: An Interview with Jonathan Rauch.
but I think what it boils down to is that gay people should deal with the same standards as straight people. And when straight people start upholding biblical law in civic culture, then maybe gay people should consider it, but not until then.
What. Hanging around gay people doesn't make you gay, the same way how gay people hanging around straight people doesn't make them straight. It's just how some people are born, and it makes no difference to a child any more than it would for a heterosexual couple’s.
Common Argument #1: Gay marriage harms the institution of traditional marriage. Your Response: Okay, then name one demonstrable, tangible effect that same.
One thing that has often puzzled many people is the argument from so many religious and political conservatives that same-sex marriages "threaten" and "undermine" traditional heterosexual marriages.
The same is said even about domestic partnership laws which would give same-sex partners a few of the same basic rights as married couples.Download