The cognitive component of the mind includes mental actions we traditionally link with "thinking" such as analyzing, comparing, assuming, inferring, questioning, contrasting, evaluating, etc. The same remains true in business as it pertains to our managerial responsibilities. We could define it as the art of taking charge of your own mind.
I will then develop a critical analysis of the primary theoretical views of Goleman. The Texas office has more politics to deal with since it is the home office and the two owners of SWBC come into the office everyday, plus all the other financial services divisions such as Mechanical Breakdown Insurance, Credit, Life and Disability, and Human Resources, etc.
He talks about the mind as if brain research were somehow our best source of information about it. She felt training and development of new and existing employees was necessary for your department to be successful.
Now let us consider how critical thinking fits into this picture. However, the contrary drives that exist in people are not best understood as social stereotype often has it, between the "emotional" and the "intellectual. The two examples above, illustrate how we could have used a "scientific form of thinking" to come to a conclusion but the "force", whatever it may have been, that influenced that way of thinking, was very strong.
Thus, since thoughts and feelings are inseparable it seems illogical to think of them as needing to balance one another.
For the month of June the phone stats went from a 1. In enables us to go into virtually any situation and to figure out the logic of whatever is happening in that situation.
Critical thinking, then, enables us to form sound beliefs and judgments, and in doing so, provides us with a basis for a "rational and reasonable" emotional life.
The department was given four weeks to make a dramatic change. One CSR was assigned to calling out only. We all approve of non-egocentric thinking in others. Senior Management bought into it and gave the green light to preceded with the plan.
If we want to change a feeling, we must identify the thinking that ultimately leads to the feeling. Of course, to determine whether a particular emotion is irrational or rational, one must look closely at the thinking that ultimately drives that emotion, not at the emotion in-and-of itself.
What am I thinking of? Plus, she felt the training and development not only of existing employees was key, but especially of the new employees. However, it is also my view that in his rush to make sense of the results of the data of brain research, Goleman inadvertently often becomes the unwitting perpetuator of social stereotypes about the relationship between emotion and reason.
Although the associates may or may not have the proper information it is still a primary source and influence that a manger must use. This shows that there are two frames with the situation can be viewed.
In other words, once one recognizes that thoughts, feelings, and desires function as inseparable reciprocal sets in human life, then no theory of brain that separates them off into compartments will adequately account for the mind, as we know it.
I shall argue that critical thinking cannot successfully direct our beliefs and actions unless it continually assesses not simply our cognitive abilities, but also our feeling or emotion states, as well as our implicit and explicit drives and agendas.
Thirdly, human minds routinely interpret, experience, plan, question, formulate agendas, laugh, argue, guess, assess, assume, clarify, make inferences, judge, project, create models, form theories--to mention a few of the myriad things that human minds routinely do.
The Problem of Translating From Brain to Mind Goleman is concerned to help us achieve insights into human emotions and their relationship to the intellectual dimension of human functioning.
Therefore I am likely to attack or flee. A diverse workplace can benefit immensely from critical thinking. Every emotion has a cognitive component that distinguishes it from other emotions. Before I go further, however, let me emphasize that there are genuine insights in his work.
If there is a good reason to think of the human mind having "two brains" or "two minds," then it is to delineate the difference between our egocentric drives with accompanying egocentric thoughts and emotions and our rational drives with accompanying rational thoughts and emotions.
Any theory which we develop of the human mind must make intelligible how it is that minds could create such multiply complex phenomena as poems, novels, plays, dances, paintings, religions, social systems, families, cultures, traditions--and do such diverse things as interpret, experience, plan, question, formulate agendas, laugh, argue, guess, assess, assume, clarify, make inferences, judge, project, model, dramatize, fantasize, and theorize.
Despite his frequent appeal to "brain research," the bulk of his book is interpretative rather than "factual. The following references were referenced by Goleman in his book, Emotional Intelligence: Managers rely heavily on the associates that surround him or her to gather and provide him or her with the information needed the decision making process.
It can be a long process that requires input from different people within the organization. One must be committed to it. For example, we unfailingly recognize the destructiveness of the egocentrism of others when in their selfish pursuits they violate our rights or needs. This aspect cannot be taken lightly nor can it be done in a hurried manner.
People affect my critical thinking due to my association with them. One view is that of the employees who took the decision to invoice the product their way.
You should use these same checkpoints.Critical Thinking Styles and Forces of Influence. Critical Thinking Styles and Forces of Influence Our basic concept of critical thinking is, at root, simple. We could define it as the art of taking charge of your own mind.
However, we rarely examine our motivations to see if they make sense.
We rarely scrutinize our reasons critically to see if they are rationally justified. "Some of the forces that influence are thinking can be gender, culture, ethnicity, religion, race, economic status, ethics, etc (University of Phoenix, ). Critical Thinking –Factors that Influence Adult Learning Reference: Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S.
(). Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), From Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, Winter, Vol.
XVI, No. 2. by Linda Elder. Emotional intelligence is a topic that is attracting a considerable amount of popular attention.
Some of the discussion is, in my view, superficial and misleading. Critical Thinking Styles and Forces of Influence Any choice or decision that a manager makes influences the organization's performance.
It is one of an employee's job responsibilities to make decisions that are in favor of the organization. Critical Thinking Styles and Forces of Influence essays A recent organizational problem occurring in my work place relates to a situation where a personal banker is thought to be forging customer signatures on loan paperwork.Download